Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7531 13
Original file (NR7531 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

a pay tipe reg

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JSR

Docket No. NR7531-13
24 October 2013

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

 
   

 

 

 

Subj: eer, Late re
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S». 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 3 Jan 13
(2) HOMC MMER/PERB memo dtd 17 Jul 13
(3) HOMC MMSB-50 memo dtd 12 Aug 13
(4) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,

hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 June
2009 to 31 May 2010 (copy at Tab A). Enclosure (2) reflects
that the Headquarters Marine Corps (HOMC) Performance Evaluation
Review Board has directed removing this report. Petitioner
further requested removing his failure of selection by the
Fiscal Year (FY) 2014 Major Selection Board, so as to be
considered by the selection board next convened to consider
officers of his category for promotion to major as an officer
who has not failed of selection for promotion to that grade.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Spooner, Swarens and
Wilson, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 24 October 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In enclosure (3), MMSB-50, the HQMC officer counseling
and evaluation office, has commented to the effect that
Petitioner's request to remove his failure of selection for
promotion has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (3), the Board finds an
injustice warranting the following corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected so that he
will be considered by the earliest possible selection board
convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to
major as an officer who has not failed of selection for
promotion to that grade.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
Sa

 

 

 

 

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of

Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

2 pad 2, KF
FC2- W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03443 12

    Original file (03443 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S,. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by completely removing the fitness report for 18 June 2007 to 31 May 2008 (copy at Tab A), modified in his previous case by the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) by removal of section K...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 08597 12

    Original file (08597 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the fitness report for 1 June 2008 to 29 May 2009 (copy at Tab A) by removing section K (reviewing officer’s marks and comments). The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Chapman and Genteman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 October 2012, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5915 14

    Original file (NR5915 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015S. In enclosure (3}, the HOMC Counseling and Evaluation Section has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request to remove his failure of selection to major has merit and warrants favorable action. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of enclosure (3), the Board finds an injustice warranting the following corrective action: RECOMMENDATION: a.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3482 14

    Original file (NR3482 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the lineal position, date of rank, and effective date in the grade of major he would have been assigned had he been selected for promotion to that grade by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 Major Selection Board, vice the FY 2014 Major Selection Board. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR455 15

    Original file (NR455 15.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7o1 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing her failures of selection before the Fiscal year (FY) 2015 and 2016 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected so that she will be considered by the earliest possible selection...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08270-09

    Original file (08270-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIG Docket No: 8270-09 14 August 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub] : “eee ar eet REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a} Title 10 U.S.C. 1552: Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 18 Mar 09 w/attachments (2) HQMC MMER/PERB memo dtd 26 Jun 09 (3) HOMC MMOA-4 memo dtd 21 Jul 09 (4) Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference-(a),...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5679 14

    Original file (NR5679 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 Major Selection Board and granting him consideration by a special selection board (SSB) for the FY 2014 Major Selection Board. “Consequently, the logical implication was that the petitioner was passed over for promotion every year...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03363-09

    Original file (03363-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BIG Docket No: 3363-09 10 April 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: a See REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION) Ref: . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08128-08

    Original file (08128-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection before the Fiscal Year (FY) 2009 Major Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board that next convened to consider officers of his category for promotion to the grade of major as an officer who has not failed of selection to that grade. The Board, consisting of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00065-10

    Original file (00065-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) wath this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 17 June to 19 July 2001, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Ms. Nappo and Messrs. Fales and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 January 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...